From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5463 invoked by alias); 12 Aug 2004 12:07:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 5450 invoked from network); 12 Aug 2004 12:07:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 12 Aug 2004 12:07:30 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i7CC7Pe3021431 for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 08:07:25 -0400 Received: from localhost.redhat.com (porkchop.devel.redhat.com [172.16.58.2]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i7CC7Oa31229; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 08:07:24 -0400 Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 657922B9D; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 08:07:19 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <411B5D77.1080906@gnu.org> Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 12:07:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-GB; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20040801 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: What should we do with rs6000? References: <20040811221554.GG25562@gnat.com> <411AA437.1060702@gnu.org> <20040812033326.GP25562@gnat.com> In-Reply-To: <20040812033326.GP25562@gnat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg00447.txt.bz2 >>I think a more immediate question to ask is: Is autoconf sufficient for >>> configuring / building on those systems and hence can the xm*.h files be >>> removed? >>> >>> Here we're going with a working assumption that the answer is yes, and >>> if it turns out that it isn't we've a bug in configure :-) > > > Do I understand correctly that you're saying that we should remove > xm-rs6000.h as well? Yep. The infrastructure is going. Andrew