From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [rfc] sigstep additions
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 01:59:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <411ACED7.5040302@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <411964CF.10409@gnu.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 43 bytes --]
I'd like to turn this into an RFA.
Andrew
[-- Attachment #2: Attached Message --]
[-- Type: message/rfc822, Size: 11689 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2.1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 209 bytes --]
Hello,
This adds more step tests to sigstep.exp. They pass on a ``fixed'' PPC
kernel but the breakpoint tests fail on a ``fixed'' i386 kernel.
Can people please test this on their various systems.
Andrew
[-- Attachment #2.1.2: diffs --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 8137 bytes --]
2004-08-10 Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
* gdb.base/sigstep.exp (breakpoint_to_handler)
(skip_over_handler, skip_to_handler): New test procedures.
(advance, advancei): Add a proper prefix, do not use
rerun_to_main.
* gdb.base/sigstep.c (main): Change to use an infinite loop.
Index: testsuite/gdb.base/sigstep.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/sigstep.c,v
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -p -u -r1.2 sigstep.c
--- testsuite/gdb.base/sigstep.c 5 Aug 2004 07:28:20 -0000 1.2
+++ testsuite/gdb.base/sigstep.c 11 Aug 2004 00:12:07 -0000
@@ -31,27 +31,38 @@ handler (int sig)
done = 1;
} /* handler */
+struct itimerval itime;
+struct sigaction action;
+
+/* The enum is so that GDB can easily see these macro values. */
+enum {
+ itimer_real = ITIMER_REAL,
+ itimer_virtual = ITIMER_VIRTUAL
+} itimer = ITIMER_VIRTUAL;
+
main ()
{
+
/* Set up the signal handler. */
- {
- struct sigaction action;
- memset (&action, 0, sizeof (action));
- action.sa_handler = handler;
- sigaction (SIGVTALRM, &action, NULL);
- }
+ memset (&action, 0, sizeof (action));
+ action.sa_handler = handler;
+ sigaction (SIGVTALRM, &action, NULL);
+ sigaction (SIGALRM, &action, NULL);
- /* Set up a one-off timer. A timer, rather than SIGSEGV, is used as
- after a timer handler finishes the interrupted code can safely
- resume. */
- {
- struct itimerval itime;
- memset (&itime, 0, sizeof (itime));
- itime.it_value.tv_usec = 250 * 1000;
- setitimer (ITIMER_VIRTUAL, &itime, NULL);
- }
+ /* The values needed for the itimer. This needs to be at least long
+ enough for the setitimer() call to return. */
+ memset (&itime, 0, sizeof (itime));
+ itime.it_value.tv_usec = 250 * 1000;
- /* Wait. */
- while (!done);
- return 0;
-} /* main */
+ /* Loop for ever, constantly taking an interrupt. */
+ while (1)
+ {
+ /* Set up a one-off timer. A timer, rather than SIGSEGV, is
+ used as after a timer handler finishes the interrupted code
+ can safely resume. */
+ setitimer (itimer, &itime, NULL);
+ /* Wait. */
+ while (!done);
+ done = 0;
+ }
+}
Index: testsuite/gdb.base/sigstep.exp
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/sigstep.exp,v
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -p -u -r1.4 sigstep.exp
--- testsuite/gdb.base/sigstep.exp 9 Aug 2004 13:16:16 -0000 1.4
+++ testsuite/gdb.base/sigstep.exp 11 Aug 2004 00:12:07 -0000
@@ -16,10 +16,11 @@
# The program sigstep.c creates a very simple backtrace containing one
-# signal handler and signal trampoline.
+# signal handler and signal trampoline. A flag is set and then the
+# handler returns. This is repeated at infinitum.
# This test runs the program up to the signal handler, and then
-# attempts to step/next the inferior back to main.
+# attempts to step/next out of the handler and back into main.
if [target_info exists gdb,nosignals] {
verbose "Skipping sigstep.exp because of nosignals."
@@ -71,12 +72,12 @@ gdb_expect_list "backtrace for nexti" ".
proc advance { i } {
global gdb_prompt
+ set prefix "$i from handler"
# Get us back into the handler
- rerun_to_main
- gdb_test "continue" ".* handler .*" "continue to handler for $i"
+ gdb_test "continue" ".* handler .*" "$prefix; continue to handler"
- set test "$i out of handler"
+ set test "$prefix; leave handler"
gdb_test_multiple "$i" "${test}" {
-re "done = 1;.*${gdb_prompt} $" {
send_gdb "$i\n"
@@ -90,7 +91,7 @@ proc advance { i } {
setup_kfail powerpc-*-*bsd* gdb/1639
fail "$test (program exited)"
}
- -re "(while ..done|return 0).*${gdb_prompt} $" {
+ -re "(while ..done|done = 0).*${gdb_prompt} $" {
# After stepping out of a function /r signal-handler, GDB will
# advance the inferior until it is at the first instruction of
# a code-line. While typically things return to the middle of
@@ -104,13 +105,13 @@ proc advance { i } {
proc advancei { i } {
global gdb_prompt
+ set prefix "$i from handleri"
set program_exited 0
# Get us back into the handler
- rerun_to_main
- gdb_test "continue" ".* handler .*" "continue to handler for $i"
+ gdb_test "continue" ".* handler .*" "$prefix; continue to handler"
- set test "$i into signal trampoline"
+ set test "$prefix; leave handler"
gdb_test_multiple "$i" "${test}" {
-re "Cannot insert breakpoint 0.*${gdb_prompt} $" {
# Some platforms use a special read-only page for signal
@@ -144,7 +145,7 @@ proc advancei { i } {
}
}
- set test "$i out of signal trampoline"
+ set test "$prefix; leave signal trampoline"
gdb_test_multiple "$i" "${test}" {
-re "while .*${gdb_prompt} $" {
pass "$test (in main)"
@@ -175,6 +176,8 @@ proc advancei { i } {
}
}
+# Check that we can step/next our way out of a signal handler.
+
advance step
advancei stepi
@@ -183,3 +186,114 @@ advancei nexti
advancei finish
advancei return
+gdb_test "set done = 1" "" "Set done as return will have skipped it"
+
+
+# Check that we can step/next our way into a signal handler.
+
+# Use the real-time itimer, as otherwize the process never gets enough
+# time to expire the timer.
+
+delete_breakpoints
+set infinite_loop [gdb_get_line_number {while (!done)}]
+gdb_test "set itimer = itimer_real"
+gdb_test "break [gdb_get_line_number {done = 0}]"
+
+
+# Try single-stepping when there's a signal pending, a breakpoint at
+# the current instruction and a breakpoint in the handler.
+
+proc skip_to_handler { i } {
+ global gdb_prompt
+ global infinite_loop
+ set prefix "$i to handler"
+
+ # Run around to the done
+ set test "$prefix; resync"
+ gdb_test_multiple "continue" "$test" {
+ -re "done = 0.*$gdb_prompt " {
+ pass "$test"
+ }
+ # other patterns can go here
+ }
+
+ # Advance to the infinite loop
+ gdb_test "advance $infinite_loop" "" "$prefix; advance to infinite loop"
+
+ # Make the signal pending
+ sleep 1
+
+ gdb_test "break handler" "" "$prefix; break handler"
+ gdb_test "$i" " handler .*" "$prefix; performing $i"
+ gdb_test "clear handler" "" "$prefix; clear handler"
+}
+
+skip_to_handler step
+skip_to_handler next
+skip_to_handler continue
+
+
+# Try single-stepping et.al. when the handler is a no-op.
+
+proc skip_over_handler { i } {
+ global gdb_prompt
+ global infinite_loop
+ set prefix "$i over handler"
+
+ # Run around to the done
+ set test "$prefix; resync"
+ gdb_test_multiple "continue" "$test" {
+ -re "done = 0.*$gdb_prompt " {
+ pass "$test"
+ }
+ # other patterns can go here
+ }
+
+ # Advance to the infinite loop
+ gdb_test "advance $infinite_loop" "" "$prefix; advance to infinite loop"
+
+ # Make the signal pending
+ sleep 1
+
+ gdb_test "$i" "done = 0.*" "$prefix; performing $i"
+}
+
+skip_over_handler step
+skip_over_handler next
+skip_over_handler continue
+
+
+# Try single instruction stepping when there's a signal pending and a
+# breakpoint in the handler.
+
+proc breakpoint_to_handler { i } {
+ global gdb_prompt
+ global infinite_loop
+ set prefix "$i breakpoint to handler"
+
+ # Run around to the done
+ set test "$prefix; resync"
+ gdb_test_multiple "continue" "$test" {
+ -re "done = 0.*$gdb_prompt " {
+ pass "$test"
+ }
+ # other patterns can go here
+ }
+
+ gdb_test "break $infinite_loop" "" "$prefix; break infinite loop"
+ gdb_test "break handler" "" "$prefix; break handler"
+
+ # Continue to the infinite loop
+ gdb_test "continue" "while ..done.*" "$prefix; continue to infinite loop"
+
+ # Make the signal pending
+ sleep 1
+
+ gdb_test "$i" " handler .*" "$prefix; performing $i"
+ gdb_test "clear $infinite_loop" "" "$prefix; clear infinite loop"
+ gdb_test "clear handler" "" "$prefix; clear handler"
+}
+
+breakpoint_to_handler step
+breakpoint_to_handler next
+breakpoint_to_handler continue
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-12 1:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-11 0:14 Andrew Cagney
2004-08-12 1:59 ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2004-08-12 17:15 ` Michael Chastain
2004-08-20 11:02 ` Michael Chastain
2004-08-24 14:29 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-08-24 15:47 ` Michael Chastain
2004-08-25 14:40 ` Michael Chastain
2004-08-25 15:29 ` Andrew Cagney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=411ACED7.5040302@gnu.org \
--to=cagney@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox