From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21546 invoked by alias); 11 Aug 2004 23:00:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 21539 invoked from network); 11 Aug 2004 23:00:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 11 Aug 2004 23:00:47 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i7BN0ke3025963 for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 19:00:47 -0400 Received: from localhost.redhat.com (porkchop.devel.redhat.com [172.16.58.2]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i7BN0ja04691; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 19:00:45 -0400 Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA4B22B9D; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 19:00:26 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <411AA50A.3060106@gnu.org> Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 23:00:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-GB; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20040801 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Chastain Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, ezannoni@redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfc/testsuite/mi] use gdb_get_line_number References: <41188B2A.nailK7Y1RD9SU@mindspring.com> <411A609D.3080306@gnu.org> <411A6B1A.nailOZS31UHES@mindspring.com> <411A7E13.5000502@gnu.org> <411A9AD3.nailG691171A6@mindspring.com> In-Reply-To: <411A9AD3.nailG691171A6@mindspring.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg00422.txt.bz2 > Andrew Cagney wrote: > >>> Or just line_callee4 and line_callee4_body? > > > I think it's confusing to have one name be a prefix of the other. > With "line_callee4_head" and "line_callee4_body", whenever I read > a name, I know what it must mean. M'kay. > But if you say so, I'll do it your way. > > Any other changes? Actually there's a whole patch in another > message, so I'll just wait for you to get some cycles to process > that. I suspect I deleted it :-( Andrew