From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17651 invoked by alias); 10 Aug 2004 23:04:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 17636 invoked from network); 10 Aug 2004 23:04:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 10 Aug 2004 23:04:47 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i7AN4ge3009957 for ; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 19:04:42 -0400 Received: from localhost.redhat.com (porkchop.devel.redhat.com [172.16.58.2]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i7AN4aa13424; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 19:04:41 -0400 Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1997D2B9D; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 19:04:31 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4119547E.8010405@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 23:04:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-GB; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20040801 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Chastain Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [obish] Zap m* methods References: <41194E61.2050801@gnu.org> <4119521E.nailAPE13HNES@mindspring.com> In-Reply-To: <4119521E.nailAPE13HNES@mindspring.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg00378.txt.bz2 > Actually, I would like to keep the init_malloc in selftest.exp. > > Here's why. When I look for regressions in gdb, I use the current > test suite with the old gdb and the new gdb. So it helps if the > current test suite doesn't do "default { fail; return }" when I > run it with gdb 6.2. I can live with the "fail" but it's the > "return" that kills me, by killing the rest of selftest.exp. > > This is going to get a bit more important than usual because test suites > before the current test suite don't work well with gcc 3.5 prerelease. > (Current test suite still has problems but I'm working on them). > > Andrew, okay with you if I put the init_malloc back? Ok, not so obish then, can you, I'm mid way through testing step. Andrew