From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29294 invoked by alias); 10 Aug 2004 15:13:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 29285 invoked from network); 10 Aug 2004 15:13:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 10 Aug 2004 15:13:51 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i7AFDoe3014957 for ; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 11:13:51 -0400 Received: from localhost.redhat.com (porkchop.devel.redhat.com [172.16.58.2]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i7AFDda08225; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 11:13:49 -0400 Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEC3E2B9D; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 11:13:31 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4118E61B.3060902@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 15:13:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-GB; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20040801 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Chastain , manjo@austin.ibm.com Cc: msnyder@redhat.com, gilliam@us.ibm.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFC] New thread testcase. References: <4117F82B.nail1N111PN0T@mindspring.com> <41187827.nailB8H1E9AWV@mindspring.com> In-Reply-To: <41187827.nailB8H1E9AWV@mindspring.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg00358.txt.bz2 > Hi Manoj, > > I am not the maintainer of gdb.threads -- that is Michael Snyder. > (See the gdb/MAINTAINERS file for a list of who maintains what > subdirectory). You'll have to work with Michael Snyder on this > patch. I can give you some feedback though. > > The basic idea of the test is good but it needs revision. Don't get > discouraged by the long list that follows. I spent some time > proof-reading this because I think it's good and I want it to get in. > > Also, since this is Michael Snyder's area, anything he says > outweighs anything I say. The changes below are just my advice. Manoj, You've got me curious. Do any of the existing tests exercise this bug (manythreads.exp comes to mind)? Oh, and what is the bug? :-) Andrew