From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24114 invoked by alias); 9 Aug 2004 07:00:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 23706 invoked from network); 9 Aug 2004 07:00:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO maynard.mail.mindspring.net) (207.69.200.243) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 9 Aug 2004 07:00:23 -0000 Received: from user-119a90a.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.36.10] helo=berman.michael-chastain.com) by maynard.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1Bu48s-00032B-00; Mon, 09 Aug 2004 03:00:22 -0400 Received: from mindspring.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by berman.michael-chastain.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 984224B102; Mon, 9 Aug 2004 03:00:30 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2004 07:00:00 -0000 From: Michael Chastain To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, drow@false.org Subject: Re: [testsuite] Kfail signals.exp failures Message-ID: <4117210E.nailSD2F36F9@mindspring.com> References: <20040808231810.GA24826@nevyn.them.org> In-Reply-To: <20040808231810.GA24826@nevyn.them.org> User-Agent: nail 10.8 6/28/04 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg00298.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > Andrew removed some "suspicious" xfails in signals.exp when he > overhauled it. They're a legitimate bug in GDB; I've put a complete > analysis in PR 1738. I expect all hardware single step targets to > fail; I maintained the previous list from the removed setup_xfails > (and added x86_64). Neat. This patch is approved. Michael C > 2004-08-08 Daniel Jacobowitz > > PR gdb/1738 > * gdb.base/signals.exp (signal_tests_1): KFAIL bug in continuing > from a breakpoint with a pending signal.