From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23046 invoked by alias); 9 Aug 2004 06:59:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 22970 invoked from network); 9 Aug 2004 06:59:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO blount.mail.mindspring.net) (207.69.200.226) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 9 Aug 2004 06:59:29 -0000 Received: from user-119a90a.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.36.10] helo=berman.michael-chastain.com) by blount.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1Bu480-0006SW-00; Mon, 09 Aug 2004 02:59:28 -0400 Received: from mindspring.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by berman.michael-chastain.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E71744B102; Mon, 9 Aug 2004 02:59:36 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2004 06:59:00 -0000 From: Michael Chastain To: drow@false.org Subject: Re: [testsuite] kfail sigaltstack.exp on i386/gnu/linux Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Message-ID: <411720D8.nailSD1FC8N7@mindspring.com> References: <20040808220220.GA22738@nevyn.them.org> <4116A794.nail8VF11ICCH@mindspring.com> <20040808231435.GA24609@nevyn.them.org> In-Reply-To: <20040808231435.GA24609@nevyn.them.org> User-Agent: nail 10.8 6/28/04 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg00297.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > I thought we had agreed that was the definition of XFAIL for GDB, an > expected external failure? That is the definition of XFAIL. I'm saying that I accept a KFAIL instead, if you have a reason. Michael C