From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30852 invoked by alias); 8 Aug 2004 14:08:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 30843 invoked from network); 8 Aug 2004 14:08:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 8 Aug 2004 14:08:10 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i78E8Ae3005236 for ; Sun, 8 Aug 2004 10:08:10 -0400 Received: from localhost.redhat.com (porkchop.devel.redhat.com [172.16.58.2]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i78E84a32020; Sun, 8 Aug 2004 10:08:04 -0400 Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FACB2B9D; Sun, 8 Aug 2004 10:07:58 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <411633BE.2010809@gnu.org> Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2004 14:08:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-GB; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20040801 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Kettenis Cc: mec.gnu@mindspring.com, eliz@gnu.org, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Improve i386 prologue analyzer References: <200408012158.i71LwpRw033840@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> <3405-Mon02Aug2004070159+0300-eliz@gnu.org> <410EAFBB.5080102@gnu.org> <2914-Tue03Aug2004065313+0300-eliz@gnu.org> <200408061933.i76JX3HJ008032@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> <4113EA3B.3000900@gnu.org> <2914-Sat07Aug2004183455+0300-eliz@gnu.org> <41150161.3000306@gnu.org> <41155A83.nail9VC11PTRT@mindspring.com> <7704-Sun08Aug2004065437+0300-eliz@gnu.org> <4115FF44.nail59F11C8I0@mindspring.com> <200408081108.i78B8Cpk009362@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <200408081108.i78B8Cpk009362@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg00253.txt.bz2 > That shouldn't be too relevant. I mean, if they were broken before > the patch, they're probably still broken. But that doesn't really > matter for the branch, does it? > > Personally I'd like to wait for another two weeks, before deciding > it's ok. I'd be willing to check it in on the branch *now* if we'd > agree we'd release 6.2.1 after that period. That gives me the > oportunity to pull it out if any problems arise. Right, So by releasing 6.2._2_ in 2-3 weeks with this patch, and 6.2.1 today we get a win-win. The MIPS fix isn't held up, and the i386 fix gets 2-3 more weeks to mature :-) Andrew