From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22294 invoked by alias); 8 Aug 2004 10:24:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 22268 invoked from network); 8 Aug 2004 10:24:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO blount.mail.mindspring.net) (207.69.200.226) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 8 Aug 2004 10:24:08 -0000 Received: from user-119a90a.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.36.10] helo=berman.michael-chastain.com) by blount.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1BtkqU-0005sO-00; Sun, 08 Aug 2004 06:24:06 -0400 Received: from mindspring.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by berman.michael-chastain.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 0AFA44B102; Sun, 8 Aug 2004 06:24:04 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2004 10:24:00 -0000 From: Michael Chastain To: eliz@gnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Improve i386 prologue analyzer Cc: kettenis@chello.nl, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, cagney@gnu.org Message-ID: <4115FF44.nail59F11C8I0@mindspring.com> References: <200408012158.i71LwpRw033840@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> <3405-Mon02Aug2004070159+0300-eliz@gnu.org> <410EAFBB.5080102@gnu.org> <2914-Tue03Aug2004065313+0300-eliz@gnu.org> <200408061933.i76JX3HJ008032@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> <4113EA3B.3000900@gnu.org> <2914-Sat07Aug2004183455+0300-eliz@gnu.org> <41150161.3000306@gnu.org> <41155A83.nail9VC11PTRT@mindspring.com> <7704-Sun08Aug2004065437+0300-eliz@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <7704-Sun08Aug2004065437+0300-eliz@gnu.org> User-Agent: nail 10.8 6/28/04 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg00241.txt.bz2 "Eli Zaretskii" wrote: eliz> Are you talking about the prologue analyzer change? Yes. eliz> If so, could you please explain why you think it needs any more eliz> ``marinating'' in HEAD? It's a new design. And this feature interacts with many different external variations. For example, I haven't seen anyone test it with gcc 2. Or with a program that uses a lot of floating point. Michael C