From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27619 invoked by alias); 7 Aug 2004 22:41:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 27611 invoked from network); 7 Aug 2004 22:41:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO maynard.mail.mindspring.net) (207.69.200.243) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 7 Aug 2004 22:41:02 -0000 Received: from user-119a90a.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.36.10] helo=berman.michael-chastain.com) by maynard.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1BtZs2-0002fO-00; Sat, 07 Aug 2004 18:40:58 -0400 Received: from mindspring.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by berman.michael-chastain.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E0DE14B102; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 18:41:07 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 07 Aug 2004 22:41:00 -0000 From: Michael Chastain To: eliz@gnu.org, cagney@gnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Improve i386 prologue analyzer Cc: kettenis@chello.nl, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Message-ID: <41155A83.nail9VC11PTRT@mindspring.com> References: <200408012158.i71LwpRw033840@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> <3405-Mon02Aug2004070159+0300-eliz@gnu.org> <410EAFBB.5080102@gnu.org> <2914-Tue03Aug2004065313+0300-eliz@gnu.org> <200408061933.i76JX3HJ008032@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> <4113EA3B.3000900@gnu.org> <2914-Sat07Aug2004183455+0300-eliz@gnu.org> <41150161.3000306@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <41150161.3000306@gnu.org> User-Agent: nail 10.8 6/28/04 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg00225.txt.bz2 I'm gonna side with Andrew on this one. Just looking superficially at the code, it's the kind of code that benefits from marinating in HEAD for a while, getting exposed to different use conditions. Michael C