From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24119 invoked by alias); 7 Aug 2004 18:54:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 24111 invoked from network); 7 Aug 2004 18:54:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 7 Aug 2004 18:54:33 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i77IsXe3004120 for ; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 14:54:33 -0400 Received: from localhost.redhat.com (porkchop.devel.redhat.com [172.16.58.2]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i77IsWa27294; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 14:54:32 -0400 Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 620DE2B9D; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 14:54:24 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <41152560.1020700@gnu.org> Date: Sat, 07 Aug 2004 18:54:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-GB; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20040801 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: Jim Blandy , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: RFA: assert that target_fetch_registers did its job References: <20040724004433.GA15591@nevyn.them.org> <410F86B4.3040500@gnu.org> <20040807184215.GA21818@nevyn.them.org> In-Reply-To: <20040807184215.GA21818@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg00216.txt.bz2 > Is there even a thread/lwp separation in GDB core? My understanding > was that the core should never see anything having to do with an LWP; > at least the trivial LWP == thread mapping should have taken place > somewhere, and GDB should just talk to the threads. In theory, yes. In reality, look at regcache.c :-( Andrew