From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
To: tromey@redhat.com
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] Enable PO files.
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2004 16:07:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4113AC94.9060302@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87isc575ry.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org> writes:
>
>
> Andrew> - the output is put in the _build_ directory (instead of RO srcdir)
>
> The only issue with this, I think, is how releases are made -- but I
> see from the patch that you already dealt with this.
>
> Andrew> - insisted on using ../intl/
> Andrew> I didn't borrow that - GDB will still use an installed intl/ (I'm
> Andrew> wondering if its time to boot intl/ out of GDB's distro).
>
> Hmm, I thought the point of doing this is that the stuff in intl,
> while readily available on Linux boxes, isn't so available elsewhere.
> I could be behind the times, though, I haven't looked at the nuts and
> bolts of gettext building in years.
Leading into 6.2, GDB found its self in a situtation where:
- intl/ wasn't needed
- on non-GNU systems, intl/ typically broke the build (serious)
yet we shipped it, doh! Given this, the consequence of enabling i18n
can be illustrated with the table:
GDB: <=6.2 6.3
GNU - i18n
non - -
(On non-GNU systems, unless we put effort into maining our local
src/intl/, it will continue to break and hence will continue to be
--disable-nls'ed).
Lets instead do what we should have done long ago, rely on the installed
intl/. We then:
- fix our intl/ build problem
- remove the burden of [pretending to] maintain intl/
- support i18n where it really matters -> GNU systems
- support i18n on non-GNU systems where intl/'s installed
> Andrew> + find * \
> Andrew> + -name '*-stub.c' -prune -o \
> Andrew> + -name 'testsuite' -prune -o \
> Andrew> + -name 'init.c' -prune -o \
> Andrew> + -name '*.[hc]' -print
>
> I never liked using find for things like this, since I tend to push
> files out of the way by "mv foo.c hacked-foo.c", but I can understand
> why you'd do it this way. I suppose it could only negatively affect
> some subset of "real gdb developers" anyway, provided releases are
> always done from a pristine checkout.
Yes, true.
Andrew
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-06 16:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-29 15:55 Andrew Cagney
2004-07-30 14:46 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-07-30 18:56 ` Tom Tromey
2004-07-31 17:42 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-08-06 16:07 ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4113AC94.9060302@gnu.org \
--to=cagney@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=tromey@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox