From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1990 invoked by alias); 5 Aug 2004 19:39:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 1979 invoked from network); 5 Aug 2004 19:39:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mclean.mail.mindspring.net) (207.69.200.57) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 5 Aug 2004 19:39:48 -0000 Received: from user-119a90a.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.36.10] helo=berman.michael-chastain.com) by mclean.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1Bso5b-0006B2-00; Thu, 05 Aug 2004 15:39:47 -0400 Received: from mindspring.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by berman.michael-chastain.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 7F8AE4B102; Thu, 5 Aug 2004 15:40:19 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2004 19:39:00 -0000 From: Michael Chastain To: cagney@gnu.org, eliz@gnu.org, neroden@twcny.rr.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Convert utils/sparclite to autoconf 2.59 Message-ID: <41128D23.nailJQR1E8AX6@mindspring.com> References: <41126FA4.2020302@twcny.rr.com> In-Reply-To: <41126FA4.2020302@twcny.rr.com> User-Agent: nail 10.8 6/28/04 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg00130.txt.bz2 Nathanael Nerode wrote: nn> Is utils/wince still used? Dunno. nn> How about utils/spu? Dunno. nn> How about utils/misc/doschk (which is in particularly bad shape)? utils/misc/doschk/doschk.c is identical to doschk.c from the doschk-1.1 package, which is available from: ftp.gnu.org/pub/non-gnu/doschk/doschk-1.1.tar.gz I just build the standalone package and use that. Works great for me. So I don't see any reason to keep doschk in utils. Eli? Andrew? Michael C