> At Mon, 02 Aug 2004 14:39:07 -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> 
>>> I'd rather have the code clearly scream its intent:
>>> 
>>> 	mips_insn32_
>>> 	mips_insn16_
> 
> 
> that seems reasonable to me.

done.  tempted by the chance to rewrite any of those unwinders from 
scratch? :-)

Andrew