From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32338 invoked by alias); 1 Aug 2004 19:23:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 32331 invoked from network); 1 Aug 2004 19:23:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 1 Aug 2004 19:23:19 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i71JNJe3017384 for ; Sun, 1 Aug 2004 15:23:19 -0400 Received: from localhost.redhat.com (porkchop.devel.redhat.com [172.16.58.2]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i71JNIa28196; Sun, 1 Aug 2004 15:23:18 -0400 Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAED22B9D; Sun, 1 Aug 2004 15:23:01 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <410D4315.1060700@gnu.org> Date: Sun, 01 Aug 2004 19:23:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-GB; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20040801 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Interesting PASS in gdb.log for mips-irix... References: <20040731212508.GF1167@gnat.com> In-Reply-To: <20040731212508.GF1167@gnat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg00015.txt.bz2 > I'm really overwhelmed right now with tons of different things to look > at, all at the same time. I'll keep this in my list, but if somebody > is interested, I'll be grateful. (tha's what bug reports are for :-) > The gdb.log file contains an entry like this: > > call Fun(foo) > That operation is not available on integers of more than 8 bytes. > (gdb) PASS: gdb.base/call-sc.exp: call Fun(foo); call call-sc-tld > > We got an error and yet we PASS. ?!?. Here's the pair: gdb_test "call Fun(foo)" "" "call Fun(foo); ${tests}" gdb_test "p/c L" " = 49 '1'" "p/c L; ${tests}" the second should still fail (the first could use gdb_test_exact I guess?). Andrew