From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13782 invoked by alias); 30 Jul 2004 13:37:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 13773 invoked from network); 30 Jul 2004 13:37:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 30 Jul 2004 13:37:10 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i6UDb9e3026652 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 09:37:10 -0400 Received: from localhost.redhat.com (porkchop.devel.redhat.com [172.16.58.2]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i6UDawa02164; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 09:37:04 -0400 Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDD8B2B9D; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 09:36:53 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <410A4EF5.3080302@gnu.org> Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 13:37:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-GB; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20040217 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: Thiemo Seufer , kettenis@chello.nl, brobecker@gnat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] MIPS_TEXT symbols should be associated to .text section? References: <20040721204604.GN1278@gnat.com> <20040729220156.GK1167@gnat.com> <20040729221904.GT965@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> <200407292314.i6TNEqwV024526@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> <20040730003138.GU965@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> <1438-Fri30Jul2004142656+0300-eliz@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <1438-Fri30Jul2004142656+0300-eliz@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-07/txt/msg00495.txt.bz2 >>Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 02:31:38 +0200 >>> From: Thiemo Seufer >>> >> >>>> > Joel, I'm seeing similar problems on NetBSD/mips (NetBSD/pmax 1.6.2 to >>>> > be precise). >> >>> >>> AFAICS it will hit all elf{32-,32-n,64-}{big,little}mips targets (as >>> opposed to *trad*mips), which are covered by SGI_COMPAT. > > > Should we release a version of GDB that has so many platforms badly > broken? Andrew? The issue is fortunatly confined to MIPS. The announcement will make that clear. We can then proceed with fixing it in mainline and either backporting to 6.2.1 or moving on to 6.3. Andrew