Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
To: Michael Chastain <mec.gnu@mindspring.com>
Cc: eliz@gnu.org, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [rfa/PROBLEMS] document threads/1650, thread internal error
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 19:51:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <410560B4.70207@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040726154838.4E0E44B104@berman.michael-chastain.com>

> + 
> + *** Threads
> + 
> + threads/1650: manythreads.exp
> + 
> + A program which creates many threads which exit very quickly (hundreds
> + of thousands of threads in the test program) can cause gdb to generate
> + an internal error.  The internal error often looks like:
> + 
> +   lin-lwp.c:744: internal-error: stop_callback: Assertion `lp->status == 0' failed.
> +   A problem internal to GDB has been detected.
> +   further debugging may prove unreliable.
> +   Quit this debugging session? (y or n)
> + 
> + This has been observed on native i686-pc-linux-gnu with linuxthreads,
> + the old threading model.  With NPTL threads, this internal error has not
> + been observed.
> + 

I think it more clearly needs to convey the following information:

- that it is (to the best of our knowledge) GNU/Linux and LinuxThreads 
specific
So the opening sentence should mention both of those data points. 
Something like ``On a GNU/Linux system that uses linuxthreads, a program 
....''

- switching to NPTL highly recommended
So the closing paragraph should make this clearer.  Something like 
``This problem has not been observed on GNU/Linux systems that use NPTL 
(New Posix Threads Library[?]). People still using linuxthreads are 
strongly encouraged to migrate to NPTL''.

We should also mention that on GNU/Linux NPTL based systems a problem 
with GDB loosing track of threads was fixed.

Andrew




  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-07-26 19:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-07-26 15:48 Michael Chastain
2004-07-26 17:45 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-07-27  0:08   ` Michael Chastain
2004-07-26 19:51 ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2004-07-27  0:32   ` Michael Chastain
2004-07-27 15:28     ` Andrew Cagney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=410560B4.70207@gnu.org \
    --to=cagney@gnu.org \
    --cc=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=mec.gnu@mindspring.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox