From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14224 invoked by alias); 26 Jul 2004 18:37:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 14179 invoked from network); 26 Jul 2004 18:37:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 26 Jul 2004 18:37:02 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i6QIb1e3020324 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 14:37:01 -0400 Received: from localhost.redhat.com (porkchop.devel.redhat.com [172.16.58.2]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i6QIb0a27015; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 14:37:00 -0400 Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39F932B9D; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 14:36:49 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <41054F41.9060900@gnu.org> Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 18:37:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-GB; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20040217 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [obish/6.2] GNU/Linux usage References: <40F934DE.30803@gnu.org> <20040717142435.GA28962@nevyn.them.org> In-Reply-To: <20040717142435.GA28962@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-07/txt/msg00371.txt.bz2 > On Sat, Jul 17, 2004 at 10:17:02AM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote: > >>> - Linux Standards Base says that programs that use 'long >>> + Linux[sic] Standards Base says that programs that use 'long >>> double' on PPC GNU/Linux are non-conformant. */ >>> set_gdbarch_long_double_bit (gdbarch, 8 * TARGET_CHAR_BIT); > > > Er, is that really necessary? It's a workgroup named "Linux Standards > Base" and even has the trademark for "LSB". I'd be annoyed if a [sic] > appeared in the middle of my company name, for sure. If we're going to have a mechanical audit process then something is needed. Would you prefer: [GNU/]Linux ? Andrew