From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29049 invoked by alias); 26 Jul 2004 14:57:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 29042 invoked from network); 26 Jul 2004 14:57:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 26 Jul 2004 14:57:27 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i6QEvRe3029969 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 10:57:27 -0400 Received: from localhost.redhat.com (porkchop.devel.redhat.com [172.16.58.2]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i6QEvRa01062; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 10:57:27 -0400 Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30DB22B9D; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 10:57:24 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <41051BD4.3000308@gnu.org> Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 14:57:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-GB; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20040217 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: Baurjan Ismagulov , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: ping: Re: handling of absolute source file paths References: <20040420154855.GD9020@ata.cs.hacettepe.edu.tr> <20040501171420.GB21679@ata.cs.hun.edu.tr> <9743-Sat01May2004211140+0300-eliz@gnu.org> <20040508212208.GA1019@ata.cs.hun.edu.tr> <6137-Tue11May2004190737+0300-eliz@gnu.org> <20040717182228.GA24895@ata.cs.hun.edu.tr> <20040723195820.GA3151@ata.cs.hun.edu.tr> <3405-Sat24Jul2004101857+0300-eliz@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <3405-Sat24Jul2004101857+0300-eliz@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-07/txt/msg00360.txt.bz2 >>> Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 21:58:20 +0200 >>> From: Baurjan Ismagulov >>> >>> On Sat, Jul 17, 2004 at 08:22:28PM +0200, Baurjan Ismagulov wrote: >> >>>> > The paperwork part is completed, here are the patches (they apply >>>> > cleanly on HEAD and gdb_6_2-branch). Could anyone please apply that? >> >>> >>> Eli? > > > I asked Andrew for a go-ahead (several days ago, when you first posted > the patch), and am waiting for him to reply. I did (last wednesday :-): > For now, just to mainline, think about 6.2 branch after 6.2 is out. Andrew PS: It's probably best to keep such questions on list.