From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5470 invoked by alias); 20 Jul 2004 01:07:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 5461 invoked from network); 20 Jul 2004 01:07:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 20 Jul 2004 01:07:27 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i6K17Re3015008 for ; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 21:07:27 -0400 Received: from localhost.redhat.com (porkchop.devel.redhat.com [172.16.58.2]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i6K17La04017; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 21:07:21 -0400 Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F0662B9D; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 21:07:25 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <40FC704C.6070205@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 01:07:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-GB; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20040217 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain , Daniel Berlin Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [commit/6.2] Fix lib (C)s; Was: src/gdb/testsuite ChangeLog lib/insight-suppor ... References: <20040719223324.0E8684B104@berman.michael-chastain.com> In-Reply-To: <20040719223324.0E8684B104@berman.michael-chastain.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-07/txt/msg00246.txt.bz2 >>Given that the boilerplate "work" is stolen from COPYING and that has a >>> (C) of 1989,1991 why should you not instead be adding those dates (and >>> have those dates through out all of GDB's files)? > > > If I had infinite time, I would. Lets consult the resident expert then :-) http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2004-07/msg00211.html Daniel, the patch changes the (C) from Red Hat to FSF. The year 2003 was added as a change was made then. Michael's asking that 2004 be also added as that's the year. Thoughts? Andrew