From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3137 invoked by alias); 16 Jul 2004 21:33:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 3127 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2004 21:33:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 16 Jul 2004 21:33:17 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i6GLXHe3007497 for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 17:33:17 -0400 Received: from localhost.redhat.com (porkchop.devel.redhat.com [172.16.58.2]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i6GLXGa01235; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 17:33:16 -0400 Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ECD52B9D; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 17:33:15 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <40F8499B.6010807@gnu.org> Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 21:33:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-GB; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20040217 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfc] Cleanup restore.exp References: <20040716211139.AAECE4B104@berman.michael-chastain.com> In-Reply-To: <20040716211139.AAECE4B104@berman.michael-chastain.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-07/txt/msg00206.txt.bz2 > ac> How about I change it to " caller$c prologue .*" with a corresponding > ac> tweak to restore.c? That way there's no confusion. > > That would be cool, if you want to do that. > > But before you touch restore.c, someone has to add a copyright notice to > it. restore.c was written by Jim Blandy of Cygnus in 1998 so there's no > doubt that FSF owns it. It was modified in 1998, 1999, 2001, and 2003 > (plus it will be modified in 2004 by adding the notice). > > For the record, I got this information from ChangeLog, the cvs > repository, and my set of historical gdb releases. > > When adding a copyright notice, one has to test the change, because > some *.exp scripts depend on line numbers in their *.c files. > It appears that restore.exp does not have this problem. > > It's enough work that I do "add copyright notice" as a separate patch, > especially because I like to separate legally significant changes > from technically significant changes. > > Would you like to add a copyright notice to restore.c, or would you like > me to do it? Feel free. Andrew