From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4772 invoked by alias); 6 Jul 2004 19:29:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 4764 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2004 19:29:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 6 Jul 2004 19:29:12 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i66JTCe3017631 for ; Tue, 6 Jul 2004 15:29:12 -0400 Received: from localhost.redhat.com (porkchop.devel.redhat.com [172.16.58.2]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i66JTB028200; Tue, 6 Jul 2004 15:29:11 -0400 Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10F562B9D; Tue, 6 Jul 2004 15:29:00 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <40EAFD7B.9020506@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2004 19:29:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-GB; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20040217 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Cc: drow@false.org, ac131313@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfa] New test sigbpt.{c,exp} References: <20040706185952.3360F4B104@berman.michael-chastain.com> In-Reply-To: <20040706185952.3360F4B104@berman.michael-chastain.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-07/txt/msg00053.txt.bz2 > mec> How about: > mec> > mec> (1) before running the program, 'disassemble bowler' > mec> (2) at the breakpoint, 'x/i $pc' > mec> check that the output of (2) matches one of the lines in (1) FYI, that's effectively what I did. It checks the $pc address against a table of valid instruction addresses. It doesn't match it fails, via gdb_test_multiple internals. All thats missing is a pattern to match any other pc address in bowler. Trying to single-step after corrupting the $pc would be meaningless. Andrew