From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16589 invoked by alias); 27 Jun 2004 00:10:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 16565 invoked from network); 27 Jun 2004 00:10:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 27 Jun 2004 00:10:23 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i5R0ANe3032358 for ; Sat, 26 Jun 2004 20:10:23 -0400 Received: from localhost.redhat.com (porkchop.devel.redhat.com [172.16.58.2]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i5R0AJ006002; Sat, 26 Jun 2004 20:10:20 -0400 Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0226D2B9D; Sat, 26 Jun 2004 20:10:13 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <40DE1064.9020900@gnu.org> Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 00:10:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-GB; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20040217 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Hilfinger Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH]: Further updates to ada-* files References: <20040608090758.C59CAF2940@nile.gnat.com> <20040616083422.C3B5CF2C03@nile.gnat.com> In-Reply-To: <20040616083422.C3B5CF2C03@nile.gnat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-06/txt/msg00583.txt.bz2 > I have committed the following patch to some Ada files, first to keep > up-to-date with ACT's sources, and second to conditionalize out a > bunch of source code that we are not yet using in the public version > for the benefit of reviewers. (It seems everyone else has taken a step back :-/ ) Lets start with the obvious, can you fix the ARI problems (Run 'gdb_ari.sh -Wari' from http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/ari/)? Looking over the code, ada-tasks.c is going to be a problem. Can we ignore that for now (removing it?) and just focus on getting basic language support enabled? Once that's done, we can start working through the underlying issues that prompted ACT to add ada-tasks.c. Did that previous ChangeLog problem get fixed? Andrew