From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20555 invoked by alias); 11 Jun 2004 03:44:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 20530 invoked from network); 11 Jun 2004 03:44:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 11 Jun 2004 03:44:50 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i5B3ini7007808; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 23:44:50 -0400 Received: from localhost.redhat.com (porkchop.devel.redhat.com [172.16.58.2]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i5B3im031413; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 23:44:48 -0400 Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 751382B9D; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 23:44:43 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <40C92AAB.3040502@gnu.org> Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 03:44:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-GB; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20040217 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ben Elliston Cc: binutils@sources.redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: top-level removal of dejagnu, expect References: <20040610092223.A1221@mailhub.air.net.au> <20040609232612.GA19856@nevyn.them.org> <20040610092946.A1602@mailhub.air.net.au> <40C86B52.1000304@gnu.org> <20040611061003.B15713@mailhub.air.net.au> In-Reply-To: <20040611061003.B15713@mailhub.air.net.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-06/txt/msg00249.txt.bz2 >>While this specific change won't technically affect the branch, I'd >>> still suggest doing the ``I'll wait a week before committing''. By >>> then GDB will be well clear. > > > I've already waited a week. http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2004-06/msg00200.html I count 2 days :-) It's important that we give the community a reasonable chance to respond to a proposal this significant. After all, since most didn't attend the GCC summit, this is the first they are hearing of all this. For GDB, we're also going to have to do a number of doco crontab, and other updates - suddenly we as developers are all going to need to find/install our own dejagnu. enjoy, Andrew (PS: was this also posted to gcc? the top-level files are kept in sync)