From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11098 invoked by alias); 7 Jun 2004 13:40:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 11090 invoked from network); 7 Jun 2004 13:40:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 7 Jun 2004 13:40:23 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i57DeNi7017808 for ; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 09:40:23 -0400 Received: from localhost.redhat.com (to-dhcp51.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.151]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i57DeG032466; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 09:40:16 -0400 Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CD5B2B9D; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 09:40:15 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <40C4703E.7040308@gnu.org> Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 13:40:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-GB; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20040217 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eli Zaretskii , Paul Hilfinger Cc: mec.gnu@mindspring.com, brobecker@gnat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH]: Updates to Ada sources, part 1 (longish) References: <20040603051228.E269F4B104@berman.michael-chastain.com> <2914-Fri04Jun2004144147+0300-eliz@gnu.org> <40C0C01D.7080504@gnu.org> <9743-Sat05Jun2004130832+0300-eliz@gnu.org> <40C1CB8E.7080108@gnu.org> <2427-Sat05Jun2004190137+0300-eliz@gnu.org> <20040605231512.1A979F2C05@nile.gnat.com> <5567-Sun06Jun2004070516+0300-eliz@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <5567-Sun06Jun2004070516+0300-eliz@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-06/txt/msg00118.txt.bz2 >>From: Paul Hilfinger >>> Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2004 19:15:12 -0400 (EDT) >>> >>> If what Andrew >>> wants is a list of exported functions, or even a list of all functions >>> in the ada* files, we can certainly provide that. If he wants >>> ChangeLog entries for differences between the old versions of the ada* >>> files in the CVS repository and the ones we just deposited, we can >>> provide that easily enough also > > > I think we want the latter. Yes, the ChangeLog just and always needs to reflect what was changed. This is accepted best pratice, and has nothing to do with what `he wants' :-/ Andrew