From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
To: Orjan Friberg <orjan.friberg@axis.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: STEP_SKIPS_DELAY question, sort of
Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 21:14:00 -0000
Message-id: <40B3B742.50007@gnu.org>
References: <40AE38D0.7010204@axis.com> <40AE659A.90207@gnu.org> <40B1BD1B.4090300@axis.com> <40B23BB2.6070001@gnu.org> <40B33399.3090803@axis.com>
X-SW-Source: 2004-05/msg00717.html

Ok,

When given:

  N+0: branch foo
  N+2: nop
PC=N (or N+1)
SPC=N+2
would this result in a double single-step leaving PC==foo?  If it does 
then you've at least got STEP_SKIPS_DELAY like behavior.

It still fixes single-step but that's a, er, later step.

Andrew