Re: [obish?sym;rfa:doc] Wire up vsyscall

Eli Zaretskii
2004-05-18T05:59:00Z

> Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 13:19:14 -0700
> From: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
>
> On Mon, 17 May 2004 16:10:30 -0400
> Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org> wrote:
>
> > +@deftypefun void inferior_created (struct target_ops *@var{objfile}, int @var{from_tty})
> > +@var{GDBN} has just created to a new inferior. For @samp{run}, it is
> > +called while the inferior is still stopped at the entry-point
> > +instruction. For @samp{attach} and @samp{core}, it is called
> > +immediatly after opening the inferior (and before any information on
> > +the inferior has been printed).
> > +@end deftypefun
>
> s/immediatly/immediately/

Oops, missed the original message.

Andrew, in addition to the typo caught by Kevin, please correct the
wording some more, viz.:

- "@var{GDBN}" should be "@value{GDBN}".

- "has just created to a new inferior" is unclear and incorrect
English. Sounds like some word is missing or should be deleted.

- The "it" in "For @samp{run}", it is called ..." is not very clear;
I think "For @samp{run}, this observer is called ..." is better.

- "after opening the inferior" is possibly inaccurate: GDB doesn't
really ``open'' the inferior, right?