From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Cagney To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Mention signal fixes in NEWS Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 21:04:00 -0000 Message-id: <40A29175.10801@gnu.org> References: <40A27605.70805@gnu.org> <20040512205638.GC3728@nevyn.them.org> X-SW-Source: 2004-05/msg00387.html On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 03:07:49PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote: Hello, The attached makes mention of all the signal changes in the NEWS file. Thoughts? Gives the suggestion it will work for the reader's target, whatever that may be. Lots of our targets still don't support this. Bah, wrong patch .... 2004-05-12 Andrew Cagney * NEWS: Mention signal fixes. Index: NEWS =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/NEWS,v retrieving revision 1.148 diff -p -u -r1.148 NEWS --- NEWS 7 May 2004 14:34:35 -0000 1.148 +++ NEWS 12 May 2004 21:03:28 -0000 @@ -3,6 +3,17 @@ *** Changes since GDB 6.1: +* Signal trampoline code overhauled + +Many generic problems with GDB's signal handling code have been fixed. +These include: support for sigaltstack and sigaction; backtrace from a +NULL pointer call; backtrace through a signal trampoline; step into +and out of signal handlers; and single-stepping in the signal +trampoline. + +Note that kernel and architecture specific limitations may still +restrict this functionality (ref PR gdb/1639). + * Cygwin support for DWARF 2 added. * Fixed build problem on IRIX 5 >From drow@false.org Wed May 12 21:05:00 2004 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Mention signal fixes in NEWS Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 21:05:00 -0000 Message-id: <20040512210545.GA4198@nevyn.them.org> References: <40A27605.70805@gnu.org> <20040512205638.GC3728@nevyn.them.org> <40A29175.10801@gnu.org> X-SW-Source: 2004-05/msg00388.html Content-length: 557 On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 05:04:53PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote: > >On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 03:07:49PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote: > > > >>>Hello, > >>> > >>>The attached makes mention of all the signal changes in the NEWS file. > >>> > >>>Thoughts? > > > > > >Gives the suggestion it will work for the reader's target, whatever > >that may be. Lots of our targets still don't support this. > > Bah, wrong patch .... > > > 2004-05-12 Andrew Cagney > > * NEWS: Mention signal fixes. Beautiful! :) Thanks. -- Daniel Jacobowitz