From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Cagney To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, Joel Brobecker Subject: Re: [rfc] Fixes for sim and gdb gdb_mbuild.sh failures Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 15:29:00 -0000 Message-id: <40A0F14A.6090609@gnu.org> References: <20040511022048.GA2172@nevyn.them.org> X-SW-Source: 2004-05/msg00332.html The others were all warnings. Two are dead fix_call_dummy's, one is a printf format string warning (sizeof is size_t, which is not necessarily long), and three are long 64-bit constants without suffixes. The last I'm least sure about. ia64-tdep.c already used the LL suffix, but alpha-tdep.c and amd64-tdep.c didn't. I'm slightly worried that a native Alpha (Compaq) compiler will complain about the LL syntax (since CORE_ADDR may be just a long in that case, and I remember Compaq's compiler as being remarkably pedantic). Joel (or someone else), I don't suppose you could test this patch by building GDB on OSF/1? There must be something in src/include to portably handle `LL' - what does bfd do? It isn't ISO-C '90. Andrew (thanks)