From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
To: Mark Kettenis <kettenis@chello.nl>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC/RFA] Print in-memory struct return values
Date: Sat, 08 May 2004 21:14:00 -0000
Message-id: <409D4D35.2090803@gnu.org>
References: <200405071707.i47H7kG5071172@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> <409C0F30.4090409@gnu.org> <200405081958.i48JwlUU000353@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> <409D4216.4050401@gnu.org> <200405082101.i48L1NUK000503@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org>
X-SW-Source: 2004-05/msg00259.html

Ouch.  That's really ugly.  I thought RETURN_VALUE_STRUCT_CONVENTION
was already long enough.  I'd really like to avoid thos really long
names.  Hmm what if I use:
RETURN_VALUE_ABI_RETURNS_ADDRESS
RETURN_VALUE_ABI_PRESERVES_ADDRESS
yes.

Andrew