From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-32949-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 2755 invoked by alias); 8 May 2004 03:50:03 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 2748 invoked from network); 8 May 2004 03:50:02 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 8 May 2004 03:50:02 -0000
Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i483o10m022081
	for <gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>; Fri, 7 May 2004 23:50:02 -0400
Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15])
	by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i483o0w13546;
	Fri, 7 May 2004 23:50:00 -0400
Received: from redhat.com (dhcp-172-16-25-160.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.25.160])
	by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i483nxC00897;
	Fri, 7 May 2004 20:50:00 -0700
Message-ID: <409C58E7.60204@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 08 May 2004 03:50:00 -0000
From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com>
Organization: Red Hat, Inc.
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; es-ES; rv:1.4.2) Gecko/20040301
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] update "info scope" with new symtypes
References: <409BFF70.8020304@redhat.com> <409C13DB.6010409@gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <409C13DB.6010409@gnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-RedHat-Spam-Score: 0 
X-SW-Source: 2004-05/txt/msg00236.txt.bz2

Andrew Cagney wrote:
>> Add LOC_COMPUTED etc. to scope_info.
> 
> 
> Michael, most of this patch is white space changes and as such should 
> separated out and committed separatly.

Andrew, I could understand your objection if this were a
request for review, but since it's a patch that I'm checking
in directly, I don't understand what your point is.  You want
every whitespace change to have its own separate entry in the
revision history?  Or... ?

I don't anticipate anyone having to go back and figure out
my whitespace changes in retrospect, especially since I'm
pretty much the only one who ever actively works on the file.
Seems like a moot point that I'm not actually listed as its
maintainer...