From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15803 invoked by alias); 4 May 2004 17:33:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 15796 invoked from network); 4 May 2004 17:33:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 4 May 2004 17:33:13 -0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i44HXCkG001828 for ; Tue, 4 May 2004 13:33:12 -0400 Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i44HX7w08565; Tue, 4 May 2004 13:33:08 -0400 Received: from redhat.com (dhcp-172-16-25-160.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.25.160]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i44HX6C11428; Tue, 4 May 2004 10:33:06 -0700 Message-ID: <4097D3D2.50201@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 04 May 2004 17:33:00 -0000 From: Michael Snyder Organization: Red Hat, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; es-ES; rv:1.4.2) Gecko/20040301 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andreas Schwab CC: Mark Kettenis , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFA] Update m68k function return value handling References: <200405022152.i42Lq2nc000394@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> <200405032156.i43LuGv8009496@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> <4096F7E6.2080805@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-RedHat-Spam-Score: 0 X-SW-Source: 2004-05/txt/msg00109.txt.bz2 Andreas Schwab wrote: > Michael Snyder writes: > > >>FYI, there's 80 or more fails for an m68k-elf cross target. >>I'm not sure if it's better or worse with your patch. >>Andreas, it seems like some of your recent changes (last six >>months or so) have broken the cross target. > > > The last time I changed something for m68k was on 2003-09-25, which is > already more than 6 months ago. The biggest changes of mine happend about > one year ago, with another batch about 8 months ago, where I converted the > m68k backend to move away from the deprecated interfaces. Yeah, it seems likely that no one has built an m68k cross toolchain in the intervening time. ;-( > Would it be possible for you to find out which changes are bad? I have > them all tested natively on m68k-linux as much as possible. I'm investigating. The first problem seems to be the choice of pcc_struct_return as the default. GCC doesn't use that, whether for native or cross. After that, I'm suspecting that we still need stack_align. One changelog entry says that you replaced stack_align with gdbarch_parm_boundary -- the trouble is that they aren't the same thing.