From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10039 invoked by alias); 4 May 2004 01:54:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 10032 invoked from network); 4 May 2004 01:54:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 4 May 2004 01:54:51 -0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i441snkG003463 for ; Mon, 3 May 2004 21:54:50 -0400 Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i441slw08703; Mon, 3 May 2004 21:54:47 -0400 Received: from redhat.com (dhcp-172-16-25-160.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.25.160]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i441skC14995; Mon, 3 May 2004 18:54:46 -0700 Message-ID: <4096F7E6.2080805@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 04 May 2004 01:54:00 -0000 From: Michael Snyder Organization: Red Hat, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; es-ES; rv:1.4.2) Gecko/20040301 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Kettenis CC: schwab@suse.de, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFA] Update m68k function return value handling References: <200405022152.i42Lq2nc000394@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> <200405032156.i43LuGv8009496@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <200405032156.i43LuGv8009496@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-RedHat-Spam-Score: 0 X-SW-Source: 2004-05/txt/msg00088.txt.bz2 Mark Kettenis wrote: > From: Andreas Schwab > Date: Mon, 03 May 2004 23:21:04 +0200 > > Mark Kettenis writes: > > > Anyway, are the Linux changes OK with you? > > Thanks, they look OK. I have sucessfully built it natively on m68k-linux > and ran a few tests, no failures. > > Thanks for testing it on m68k-linux. I noticed that I forgot about > including "floatformat.h" so I didn't update Makefile.in. Fixed with > the attached patch which is what I actually checked in. FYI, there's 80 or more fails for an m68k-elf cross target. I'm not sure if it's better or worse with your patch. Andreas, it seems like some of your recent changes (last six months or so) have broken the cross target.