Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [obish] Delete ppcnbsd_pc_in_sigtramp
Date: Sat, 01 May 2004 00:10:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4092EAFE.8030201@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4092D5AE.2030603@gnu.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 415 bytes --]

> Follow-up to adding a proper sigtramp unwinder to ppcnbsd - the old pc_in_sigtramp code is no longer needed - removed.

Actually I missed, this is the patch eliminating ppcnbsd's in-sigtramp. 
  The comment still applies.

committed,
Andrew

> 2004-04-30  Andrew Cagney  <cagney@redhat.com>
> 
> 	* mipsnbsd-tdep.c (mipsnbsd_pc_in_sigtramp): Delete function.
> 	(mipsnbsd_init_abi): Do not set pc_in_sigtramp.
> 

[-- Attachment #2: diffs --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1341 bytes --]

2004-04-30  Andrew Cagney  <cagney@redhat.com>

	* ppcnbsd-tdep.c (ppcnbsd_init_abi): Do not set
	deprecated_pc_in_sigtramp.
	(ppcnbsd_pc_in_sigtramp): Delete function.

Index: ppcnbsd-tdep.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/ppcnbsd-tdep.c,v
retrieving revision 1.14
diff -p -u -r1.14 ppcnbsd-tdep.c
--- ppcnbsd-tdep.c	23 Apr 2004 01:02:32 -0000	1.14
+++ ppcnbsd-tdep.c	1 May 2004 00:07:51 -0000
@@ -201,13 +201,6 @@ static struct core_fns ppcnbsd_elfcore_f
   NULL					/* next */
 };
 
-static int
-ppcnbsd_pc_in_sigtramp (CORE_ADDR pc, char *func_name)
-{
-  /* FIXME: Need to add support for kernel-provided signal trampolines.  */
-  return (nbsd_pc_in_sigtramp (pc, func_name));
-}
-
 /* NetBSD is confused.  It appears that 1.5 was using the correct SVr4
    convention but, 1.6 switched to the below broken convention.  For
    the moment use the broken convention.  Ulgh!.  */
@@ -288,7 +281,6 @@ static void
 ppcnbsd_init_abi (struct gdbarch_info info,
                   struct gdbarch *gdbarch)
 {
-  set_gdbarch_deprecated_pc_in_sigtramp (gdbarch, ppcnbsd_pc_in_sigtramp);
   /* For NetBSD, this is an on again, off again thing.  Some systems
      do use the broken struct convention, and some don't.  */
   set_gdbarch_return_value (gdbarch, ppcnbsd_return_value);

      reply	other threads:[~2004-05-01  0:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-04-30 22:39 Andrew Cagney
2004-05-01  0:10 ` Andrew Cagney [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4092EAFE.8030201@gnu.org \
    --to=cagney@gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox