From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4284 invoked by alias); 29 Apr 2004 21:15:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 4264 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2004 21:15:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 29 Apr 2004 21:15:02 -0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i3TLF0KG003151 for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 17:15:00 -0400 Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i3TLEtw12539; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 17:14:55 -0400 Received: from redhat.com (dhcp-172-16-25-160.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.25.160]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i3TLEsC04997; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 14:14:54 -0700 Message-ID: <4091704E.2050809@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 21:15:00 -0000 From: Michael Snyder Organization: Red Hat, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; es-ES; rv:1.4.2) Gecko/20040301 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Cagney CC: Daniel Jacobowitz , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, cagney Subject: Re: [RFA] mips 32/64 register/stack fix References: <408813A9.6000402@redhat.com> <4088242A.4070601@gnu.org> <40883C90.7030509@redhat.com> <40884155.2090205@gnu.org> <40884BEF.5070909@redhat.com> <409025F2.9080704@gnu.org> <20040429031240.GA12518@nevyn.them.org> <409105C7.1020502@gnu.org> <40914235.2040702@redhat.com> <40915C55.2050807@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <40915C55.2050807@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-RedHat-Spam-Score: 0 X-SW-Source: 2004-04/txt/msg00693.txt.bz2 Andrew Cagney wrote: > See daniel's follow up: OK, well, FYI, I ran the testsuite with your revised patch, and it introduced a bunch of new fails in the whole callfuncs family, along with some other completely unexpected places (ptype???). I'm gonna step back and let you guys work it out.