From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
Cc: Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com>,
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, cagney <cagney@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFA] mips 32/64 register/stack fix
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 13:40:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <409105C7.1020502@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040429031240.GA12518@nevyn.them.org>
> On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 05:45:22PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>
>>>> >Here's your tdep info:
>>>> >{elf_flags = 1610625025, mips_abi = MIPS_ABI_EABI32,
>>
>>>
>>> I was looking to see if anything like that was present -> it is clearly
>>> identified as a 32-bit ABI binary.
>>>
>>> I think the bug is in mips_register_type, the tail end should probably
>>> be changed to read something like:
>>>
>>> else if (regnum >= NUM_REGS
>>> && gdbarch_tdep (gdbarch)->mips64_transfers_32bit_regs_p)
>>> /* The target, while using a 64-bit raw register buffer, is only
>>> transfering 32-bits of each integer register. Reflect this in
>>> the cooked/pseudo register value. */
>>> return builtin_type_int32;
>>> else if (regnum > NUM_REGS
>= NUM_REGS
>>> && mips_saved_regsize (gdbarch) == 4)
>>> /* A 32-bit ABI such as o32 possibly running on a 64-bit ISA. */
>>> return builtin_type_int32;
>>> else if (mips_regsize (gdbarch) == 8)
>>> /* 64-bit ISA. */
>>> return builtin_type_int64;
>>> else
>>> /* 32-bit ISA. */
>>> return builtin_type_int32;
>
>
> Would you mind clarifying the reason for having mips_regsize, which is
> used in a number of other places, return a regsize based on the ISA?
Hasn't this all come up before?
It's the register size of the underlying ISA, on top of which the ABI is
implemented. I think I'll rename mips_regsize and mips_saved_regsize to
clarify this.
> This change to mips_register_type conveys the fact that we've only got
> 32 bits of data. But we'll choose to print (in info registers) a
> 64-bit wide field for each GPR if the binary is tagged E_MIPS_ARCH_64 |
> E_MIPS_ABI_EABI32, and a 32-bit field if it's tagged E_MIPS_ARCH_2 |
> E_MIPS_ABI_EABI32. Conceptually, I think we're interested in some
> combination of the available register size (-> a property of the target)
> and the size of registers known to the inferior program (-> unclear mix
> of its ABI and ISA).
It does? With the above it should always print a 32-bit GPR reflecting
the 32-bit ABI. If you think it should display something else, look at
user-regs which lets you implement registers using the frame register
values (something psuedo registers can't handle).
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-29 13:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-22 18:49 Michael Snyder
2004-04-22 19:59 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-04-22 21:29 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-04-22 21:43 ` Michael Snyder
2004-04-22 22:04 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-04-22 22:49 ` Michael Snyder
2004-04-28 21:45 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-04-29 3:12 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-04-29 13:40 ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2004-04-29 14:34 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-04-29 18:32 ` [commit] mips_isa_regsize, mips_abi_regsize; Was: " Andrew Cagney
2004-04-29 19:45 ` [commit] compute abi regsize; Was: Andrew Cagney
2004-04-29 17:58 ` [RFA] mips 32/64 register/stack fix Michael Snyder
2004-04-29 19:49 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-04-29 21:15 ` Michael Snyder
2004-04-29 21:36 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-04-30 0:40 ` Andrew Cagney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=409105C7.1020502@gnu.org \
--to=cagney@gnu.org \
--cc=cagney@redhat.com \
--cc=drow@mvista.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=msnyder@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox