Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
Cc: Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com>,
	gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, cagney <cagney@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFA] mips 32/64 register/stack fix
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 13:40:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <409105C7.1020502@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040429031240.GA12518@nevyn.them.org>

> On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 05:45:22PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> 
>>>> >Here's your tdep info:
>>>> >{elf_flags = 1610625025, mips_abi = MIPS_ABI_EABI32,
>>
>>> 
>>> I was looking to see if anything like that was present -> it is clearly 
>>> identified as a 32-bit ABI binary.
>>> 
>>> I think the bug is in mips_register_type, the tail end should probably 
>>> be changed to read something like:
>>> 
>>>   else if (regnum >= NUM_REGS
>>> 	   && gdbarch_tdep (gdbarch)->mips64_transfers_32bit_regs_p)
>>>     /* The target, while using a 64-bit raw register buffer, is only
>>>        transfering 32-bits of each integer register.  Reflect this in
>>>        the cooked/pseudo register value.  */
>>>     return builtin_type_int32;
>>>   else if (regnum > NUM_REGS

 >= NUM_REGS

>>> 	   && mips_saved_regsize (gdbarch) == 4)
>>>     /* A 32-bit ABI such as o32 possibly running on a 64-bit ISA.  */
>>>     return builtin_type_int32;
>>>   else if (mips_regsize (gdbarch) == 8)
>>>     /* 64-bit ISA.  */
>>>     return builtin_type_int64;
>>>   else
>>>     /* 32-bit ISA.  */
>>>     return builtin_type_int32;
> 
> 
> Would you mind clarifying the reason for having mips_regsize, which is
> used in a number of other places, return a regsize based on the ISA?

Hasn't this all come up before?

It's the register size of the underlying ISA, on top of which the ABI is 
implemented.  I think I'll rename mips_regsize and mips_saved_regsize to 
clarify this.

> This change to mips_register_type conveys the fact that we've only got
> 32 bits of data.  But we'll choose to print (in info registers) a
> 64-bit wide field for each GPR if the binary is tagged E_MIPS_ARCH_64 |
> E_MIPS_ABI_EABI32, and a 32-bit field if it's tagged E_MIPS_ARCH_2 |
> E_MIPS_ABI_EABI32.  Conceptually, I think we're interested in some
> combination of the available register size (-> a property of the target)
> and the size of registers known to the inferior program (-> unclear mix
> of its ABI and ISA).

It does?  With the above it should always print a 32-bit GPR reflecting 
the 32-bit ABI.  If you think it should display something else, look at 
user-regs which lets you implement registers using the frame register 
values (something psuedo registers can't handle).

Andrew



  reply	other threads:[~2004-04-29 13:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-04-22 18:49 Michael Snyder
2004-04-22 19:59 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-04-22 21:29   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-04-22 21:43   ` Michael Snyder
2004-04-22 22:04     ` Andrew Cagney
2004-04-22 22:49       ` Michael Snyder
2004-04-28 21:45         ` Andrew Cagney
2004-04-29  3:12           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-04-29 13:40             ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2004-04-29 14:34               ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-04-29 18:32                 ` [commit] mips_isa_regsize, mips_abi_regsize; Was: " Andrew Cagney
2004-04-29 19:45                   ` [commit] compute abi regsize; Was: Andrew Cagney
2004-04-29 17:58               ` [RFA] mips 32/64 register/stack fix Michael Snyder
2004-04-29 19:49                 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-04-29 21:15                   ` Michael Snyder
2004-04-29 21:36                     ` Andrew Cagney
2004-04-30  0:40                       ` Andrew Cagney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=409105C7.1020502@gnu.org \
    --to=cagney@gnu.org \
    --cc=cagney@redhat.com \
    --cc=drow@mvista.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=msnyder@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox