From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9801 invoked by alias); 29 Apr 2004 08:09:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 9793 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2004 08:09:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO miranda.se.axis.com) (193.13.178.2) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 29 Apr 2004 08:09:19 -0000 Received: from axis.com (ironmaiden.se.axis.com [10.13.8.120]) by miranda.se.axis.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/Debian-5local0.1) with ESMTP id i3T89EUm029856; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 10:09:14 +0200 Message-ID: <4090B829.1010806@axis.com> Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 08:09:00 -0000 From: Orjan Friberg Organization: Axis Communications User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eli Zaretskii CC: Andrew Cagney , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Multiplexed registers and invalidating the register cache References: <407D242B.109@axis.com> <20040414144607.GA5700@nevyn.them.org> <407E67EA.80701@axis.com> <407E70FD.7060709@axis.com> <407EAA4B.7000500@gnu.org> <407FD693.2080804@axis.com> <408030DB.3080708@gnu.org> <4083DE9C.7000208@axis.com> <40869FC4.2090407@gnu.org> <4087CF61.4030109@axis.com> <4087D794.10209@gnu.org> <4088FD0F.7050501@axis.com> <408927CF.10807@gnu.org> <40893437.2020907@axis.com> <4089636D.2090605@gnu.org> <7137-Sat24Apr2004113105+0300-eliz@gnu.org> <408FDF20.7000306@gnu.org> <2914-Wed28Apr2004204005+0300-eliz@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <2914-Wed28Apr2004204005+0300-eliz@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-04/txt/msg00663.txt.bz2 Eli Zaretskii wrote: >>Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 12:43:12 -0400 >>From: Andrew Cagney >> >>>>>>>+The target's register contents has changed. >>>> >>>>>FYI, this should probably read: >>>>> The target's memory or register contents have [has?] changed. >>>>>eli? >>> >>> >>>I'm not sure; what is the difference between the two wordings? >> >>"have" sounds right (...), hmm. Check dictionary ``/has/ 3rd person >>_singular_, present of /have/'' [canadian oxford] so "have" is correct. > > > I didn't realize that you were talking only about "has" vs "have" > (your alternative wording was different in other ways). I agree that > "have" is correct here. Ok to commit the below, then? (Or should the event description include the "memory" part of Andrew's suggestion as well?) Index: ChangeLog =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/doc/ChangeLog,v retrieving revision 1.406 diff -u -p -r1.406 ChangeLog --- ChangeLog 26 Apr 2004 09:36:56 -0000 1.406 +++ ChangeLog 29 Apr 2004 08:03:19 -0000 @@ -1,3 +1,7 @@ +2004-04-29 Orjan Friberg + + * observer.texi (GDB Observers): Correct spelling. + 2004-04-26 Orjan Friberg * observer.texi (GDB Observers): Add target_changed event. Index: observer.texi =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/doc/observer.texi,v retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -p -r1.4 observer.texi --- observer.texi 26 Apr 2004 09:36:56 -0000 1.4 +++ observer.texi 29 Apr 2004 08:03:19 -0000 @@ -75,5 +75,5 @@ The inferior has stopped for real. @end deftypefun @deftypefun void target_changed (struct target_ops *@var{target}) -The target's register contents has changed. +The target's register contents have changed. @end deftypefun -- Orjan Friberg Axis Communications