From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5401 invoked by alias); 22 Apr 2004 19:59:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 5383 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2004 19:59:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (24.157.170.238) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 22 Apr 2004 19:59:46 -0000 Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A7522B9D; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 15:59:38 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4088242A.4070601@gnu.org> Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 19:59:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-GB; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20040217 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Snyder Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, cagney , Daniel Jacobowitz Subject: Re: [RFA] mips 32/64 register/stack fix References: <408813A9.6000402@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <408813A9.6000402@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-04/txt/msg00540.txt.bz2 > ! if (mips_saved_regsize (tdep) < mips_regsize (gdbarch) && > ! trad_frame_addr_p (info->saved_regs, regnum)) > ! { This doesn't look right, can you post a backtrace? The MIPS has [0 .. NUM_REGS) ISA sized registers and [NUM_REGS .. 2*NUM_REGS) ABI sized registers. So if the caller wants an ABI register it should have passed in that register number. Andrew