From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24361 invoked by alias); 15 Apr 2004 18:49:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 24353 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2004 18:49:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (66.30.197.194) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 15 Apr 2004 18:49:07 -0000 Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1283F2B9C; Thu, 15 Apr 2004 14:49:04 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <407ED91F.7060502@gnu.org> Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 18:49:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-GB; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20040217 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jim Blandy Cc: Roland McGrath , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] add-symbol-file-from-memory command References: <200404082238.i38Mc6OB011861@magilla.sf.frob.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-04/txt/msg00323.txt.bz2 > Roland McGrath writes: > >>> This is a version of the patch with the internal function's calling >>> convention changed as Jim suggested. > > > This looks fine. If neither you nor Daniel feel it should be a > 'maint' command, that's okay. Please commit. FYI, this isn't a maint command. While wierd, its use by a normal user is reasonable. Did this get documented? Andrew