Re: Multiplexed registers and invalidating the register cache

Andrew Cagney
2004-04-28T16:43:17Z

>>> Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 14:41:49 -0400
>>> From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
>>>
>>
>>>> > +The target's register contents has changed.
>>
>>>
>>> FYI, this should probably read:
>>> The target's memory or register contents have [has?] changed.
>>> eli?
>
>
> I'm not sure; what is the difference between the two wordings?

"have" sounds right (...), hmm. Check dictionary ``/has/ 3rd person
_singular_, present of /have/'' [canadian oxford] so "have" is correct.

Andrew