From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22209 invoked by alias); 15 Apr 2004 11:25:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 22184 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2004 11:25:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO miranda.se.axis.com) (193.13.178.2) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 15 Apr 2004 11:25:20 -0000 Received: from axis.com (ironmaiden.se.axis.com [10.13.8.120]) by miranda.se.axis.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/Debian-5local0.1) with ESMTP id i3FBOjUm014913; Thu, 15 Apr 2004 13:24:45 +0200 Message-ID: <407E70FD.7060709@axis.com> Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 11:25:00 -0000 From: Orjan Friberg Organization: Axis Communications User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Multiplexed registers and invalidating the register cache References: <407D242B.109@axis.com> <20040414144607.GA5700@nevyn.them.org> <407E67EA.80701@axis.com> In-Reply-To: <407E67EA.80701@axis.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-04/txt/msg00302.txt.bz2 Orjan Friberg wrote: > Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > >> >> I think you should make this change unconditionally - and flush the >> entire frame cache. > > > Pardon my ignorance, but why should the entire frame cache be flushed, > instead of just invalidating the current set of registers? Is it > because frame pointer/return address registers (or something else > affecting other frames) might change? Too quick on the send button... just found the flushregs command, which does what I want for the time being (flushing the register cache). -- Orjan Friberg Axis Communications