From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28194 invoked by alias); 3 Apr 2004 16:06:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 28172 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2004 16:06:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (24.157.170.238) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 3 Apr 2004 16:06:48 -0000 Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 089E82B92; Sat, 3 Apr 2004 10:59:36 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <406EDF67.2030201@gnu.org> Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2004 16:06:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-GB; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20040217 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: GDB 6.1 branch FROZEN References: <20040403011932.93EC34B104@berman.michael-chastain.com> In-Reply-To: <20040403011932.93EC34B104@berman.michael-chastain.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-04/txt/msg00095.txt.bz2 > Andrew Cagney writes: > >>> My intention is to let the snapshot process churn something out >>> "tonight", followed by a 6.1 candidate sometime "tomorrow". > > > I'm publishing my next spin on i686-pc-linux-gnu about 30-40 hours > from now. This includes gdb 6.0.91. > > I'll be sure to test the 6.1 candidate on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 > a few hours after it comes out. I can do something on i686-pc-linux-gnu > as well. > > I just got word back from a user that 6.0.91 does not build > on the user's hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.00 system (pr gdb/1458). What happens if --disable-nls is specified? Andrew