Re: [patch] allow switching stacks

Eli Zaretskii
2004-03-09T06:06:28Z

> Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2004 22:58:29 +0000
> From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com>
>
> Good idea, and nice implementation. My only suggestions are in
> the user interface realm. I'm thinking something like
> "non-contiguous stacks" would be more meaningful than "multiple
> stacks" (there's really still only one stack, it's just broken
> into two segments). Same goes for switch-stacks; it's a bit
> non-intuitive to me. segmented-stack? discontiguous-stack?

I share Muchael's concerns (I'd use "non-contiguous stack" in both
instances). On top of that, if this patch is approved, it needs a
corresponding patch for the manual, since we'd be introducing a new
command.