From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14232 invoked by alias); 31 Mar 2004 16:24:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 14201 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2004 16:23:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.129.200.20) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 31 Mar 2004 16:23:58 -0000 Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 420CF2B92; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 11:24:01 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <406AF0A1.5040502@gnu.org> Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 16:24:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-GB; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20040217 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: Joel Brobecker , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA/hppa] Fix pb in inferior function call References: <20040331041848.GO888@gnat.com> <20040331043505.GA18128@nevyn.them.org> In-Reply-To: <20040331043505.GA18128@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg00760.txt.bz2 > I think one of the previous dummy call mechanisms wasn't > supposed to: > if (DEPRECATED_DUMMY_WRITE_SP_P ()) > DEPRECATED_DUMMY_WRITE_SP (sp); It was never really pinned down, either using write_sp or using push_dummy_args (or what ever it was called), or ... Now push_dummy_call is responsible for everything. > so it probably just got lost in a conversion. Yes. Joel, do you think a pull up of the hppa stuff onto the 6.1 branch would be useful? (it can only break HP/UX so is "mostly harmless"). Andrew