From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9728 invoked by alias); 26 Mar 2004 03:43:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 9721 invoked from network); 26 Mar 2004 03:43:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (66.30.197.194) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 26 Mar 2004 03:43:08 -0000 Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6E8A2B9C; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 22:43:08 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4063A6CC.3060502@gnu.org> Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 03:43:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-GB; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20040217 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kris Warkentin Cc: "Gdb-Patches@Sources.Redhat.Com" Subject: Re: [patch] Bring QNX Neutrino support forward. References: <4060A9C0.1090906@qnx.com> <4060C665.6010405@gnu.org> <40618FCD.5010802@qnx.com> <40619CB3.90001@gnu.org> <4061B878.6010209@qnx.com> <406315A6.5000207@qnx.com> In-Reply-To: <406315A6.5000207@qnx.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg00651.txt.bz2 > Andrew, given that the core_fns are not deprecated yet, is this patch otherwise okay? It looks like I might be able to add some BFD support for our cores (perhaps a qnx_nto_core_flavour?) but I wouldn't mind getting this patch out of my sandbox for now. They are not yet deprecated (that will take me at least a week) ... :-) Andrew