From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27886 invoked by alias); 25 Mar 2004 19:31:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 27878 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2004 19:31:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 25 Mar 2004 19:31:20 -0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (nat-pool-rdu-dmz.redhat.com [172.16.52.200] (may be forged)) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2PJVJWA022177 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 14:31:20 -0500 Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i2PJVDM24686; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 14:31:18 -0500 Received: from redhat.com (dhcp-172-16-25-160.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.25.160]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i2PJVCC21081; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 11:31:13 -0800 Message-ID: <40633380.30003@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 19:31:00 -0000 From: Michael Snyder Organization: Red Hat, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; es-ES; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030922 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eli Zaretskii CC: Bob Rossi , ian@airs.com, dewar@gnat.com, gdbheads@gnu.org, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [Gdbheads] A small patch case study, -file-list-exec-source-files References: <20040225040059.GB19094@white> <16456.65451.461753.66554@localhost.redhat.com> <20040306155700.GA9439@white> <20040311132508.GA2504@white> <20040323130900.GA17339@white> <40605C9F.2050700@gnat.com> <20040325043648.GA20454@white> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-RedHat-Spam-Score: 0 X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg00630.txt.bz2 Eli Zaretskii wrote: >>Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 23:36:48 -0500 >>From: Bob Rossi >> >>So the question is, is patch review the most important aspect of >>being a GNU GDB maintainer? >> >>How many GDB maintainers would answer yes to this? > > > IMHO, it's one of the most important aspects. The other one is to > make his/her own contributions to GDB. An important observation. There may be some of us who want to do nothing more than review patches -- but I can't think who. For most, we have work of our own that we want to do too. We have to strike a balance of priority between our own contributions, each others, and contributions coming from outside.