From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25349 invoked by alias); 25 Mar 2004 15:08:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 25303 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2004 15:08:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nile.gnat.com) (205.232.38.5) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 25 Mar 2004 15:08:11 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26418F2D4A; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 10:08:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from nile.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (nile.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 15308-01-8; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 10:08:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from gnat.com (hoosic.gnat.com [205.232.38.102]) by nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCE4AF2D49; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 10:08:10 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4062F5DA.10708@gnat.com> Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 15:08:00 -0000 From: Robert Dewar User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ian Lance Taylor Cc: Bob Rossi , gdbheads@gnu.org, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [Gdbheads] A small patch case study, -file-list-exec-source-files References: <16456.65451.461753.66554@localhost.redhat.com> <20040306155700.GA9439@white> <20040311132508.GA2504@white> <20040323130900.GA17339@white> <40605C9F.2050700@gnat.com> <20040325043648.GA20454@white> <20040325055925.GS1104@gnat.com> <406279E4.3090903@gnat.com> <20040325124313.GA21101@white> <4062E6E1.2070605@gnat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at nile.gnat.com X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg00616.txt.bz2 > I was there. I disagree. It absolutely was a factor. It was the > elephant in the middle of the room. We at Cygnus were pointing it out > loudly. Richard Kenner and Richard Stallman were ignoring it. Well it was an imaginary elephant. Yes, Richard Kenner was very particular about what patches he admitted. This has nothing whatever to do with Ada. You are just guessing that this was somehow related, it was not.