From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-31804-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 8170 invoked by alias); 25 Mar 2004 06:19:19 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 8158 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2004 06:19:18 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO nile.gnat.com) (205.232.38.5)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 25 Mar 2004 06:19:18 -0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id C5A04F28EA; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 01:19:17 -0500 (EST)
Received: from nile.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (nile.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP
 id 06689-01-9; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 01:19:17 -0500 (EST)
Received: from gnat.com (hoosic.gnat.com [205.232.38.102])
	by nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 63A6AF28D8; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 01:19:17 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <406279E4.3090903@gnat.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 06:19:00 -0000
From: Robert Dewar <dewar@gnat.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ian Lance Taylor <ian@airs.com>
Cc: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@gnat.com>, gdbheads@gnu.org,
	gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Gdbheads] A small patch case study, -file-list-exec-source-files
References: <20040225040059.GB19094@white>	<16456.65451.461753.66554@localhost.redhat.com>	<20040306155700.GA9439@white> <20040311132508.GA2504@white>	<20040323130900.GA17339@white> <40605C9F.2050700@gnat.com>	<m3oeqntuci.fsf@gossamer.airs.com> <20040325043648.GA20454@white>	<20040325055925.GS1104@gnat.com> <m3fzbxe9ro.fsf@gossamer.airs.com>
In-Reply-To: <m3fzbxe9ro.fsf@gossamer.airs.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at nile.gnat.com
X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg00595.txt.bz2

Ian Lance Taylor wrote:

> I want to note that this is only partially true.  In fact there are a
> number of people who are paid to work on gdb. 

Yes, but they aren't necessarily paid to work for the same goals as
FSF maintenance. If I am working for company X which wants a reliable
GDB for target Y, we may have zero interest in a patch that does not
promote this goal.