From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-31803-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 4113 invoked by alias); 25 Mar 2004 06:11:38 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 4106 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2004 06:11:37 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO nile.gnat.com) (205.232.38.5)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 25 Mar 2004 06:11:37 -0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id D82A3F2B55; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 01:11:36 -0500 (EST)
Received: from nile.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (nile.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP
 id 15854-01-4; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 01:11:36 -0500 (EST)
Received: from gnat.com (hoosic.gnat.com [205.232.38.102])
	by nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 6BF7FF2CBA; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 01:11:36 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <40627817.3020306@gnat.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 06:11:00 -0000
From: Robert Dewar <dewar@gnat.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Bob Rossi <bob@brasko.net>
Cc: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>, gdbheads@gnu.org,
	gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Gdbheads] Re: Feb's patch resolution rate
References: <20040225040059.GB19094@white>	<16456.65451.461753.66554@localhost.redhat.com>	<20040306155700.GA9439@white> <20040311132508.GA2504@white>	<20040323130900.GA17339@white> <4060A523.6010801@gnu.org>	<yf2n067p8na.fsf@hawaii.kealia.com> <4060ACC8.10209@gnu.org>	<u4qseixc8.fsf@elta.co.il> <E1B6KAZ-0001ro-Mf@fencepost.gnu.org> <20040325041331.GD19966@white>
In-Reply-To: <20040325041331.GD19966@white>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at nile.gnat.com
X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg00594.txt.bz2

Bob Rossi wrote:

> Is quick linear with the size of the patch?

To me, quick varies with the interest/importance/complexity/size of the
patch, and it is impossible to make firm rules. Probably a reasonable
rule is to try to make sure that patches just do not sit with no
response, i.e. that you at least get some feedback as to why there
is a delay.