Re: [patch] Bring QNX Neutrino support forward.

Kris Warkentin
2004-03-24T16:32:18Z

Andrew Cagney wrote:

> Ulgh, one of those (if you remember any more details :-). I'll need
> to investigate - these race conditions are a royal pain.

I'll just temporarily move the signal setup stuff to my _init....okay.
It's this line of code in my init function:

signal_stop_update (target_signal_from_name ("SIG45"), 0);

The array 'signal_stop' in signal_stop_update has not been initialized
so we blow up.

> There are no deprecated markers so there's no hint. A grep of
> add_core_fns reveals that the i386/amd64 and GNU/Linux PPC do not make
> the call so I'm pretty sure that I'm not talking theory here (notably
> 32x64 GNU/Linux debugging works on those systems -- that needs regsets).

I think I'm failing to understand you here. If I don't use the
regset_core_functions, how do I sniff out a Neutrino core using

if (bfd_get_section_by_name (abfd, ".qnx_core_info"))
you_have_core();
?

Should I be adding that to the default_core_sniffer?

cheers,

Kris